Sexy cars

[momentomoir]

not sure if this goes here or in the pic thread

http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/56/l_ba15b0228465409d9651aa08f2d1f550.jpg
http://c3.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/37/l_37ab9c94f1884f2eb7ca2f69a7587392.jpg
http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/59/l_25082657f93b4b4f96c2d483089d50fc.jpg
http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/53/l_941dfbefb4534511bbe5c2fc1da708f0.jpg

[JC316]

Nice! We need a sexy car thread. Here are my nominations.

http://wallpapers.boolsite.net/srv36/Images/Wallpapers/Vehicules/Aston/AstonMartinDB7Vantage01.jpg
http://www.mustangreview.com/images/1969Mach1_lf_01.jpg
http://oldtimer4.webpark.pl/69_Chevrolet_Camaro_Z28.jpg
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n10/JC316_2006/Mustang%20GT/Stripes/SDC14751.jpg?t=1261385994

[Triprift]

http://www.zercustoms.com/car-show/albums/userpics/10001/1995-McLaren-F1-LM-1.jpg
http://www.toyota-supra.info/albums/fatf/1995_toyota_supra_fatf_12.jpg

[FordGT90Concept]

Saleen S7
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9e/SAG2004_181_Ferrari.JPG/800px-SAG2004_181_Ferrari.JPG

Jaguar XJ220
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/JaguarXJ220.jpg/800px-JaguarXJ220.jpg

Ford GT40
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/59/1965_Ford_GT40.jpg/800px-1965_Ford_GT40.jpg

Ford GT
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/2005_Ford_GT.jpg/800px-2005_Ford_GT.jpg

Buggatti Veyron
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/41/Bugatti_Veyron_-_BCN_motorshow_2009.JPG/800px-Bugatti_Veyron_-_BCN_motorshow_2009.JPG

SSC Ultimate Aero
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/2007_ssc_ultimateaerott13.jpg/800px-2007_ssc_ultimateaerott13.jpg

[WhiteLotus]

out of all them:

The fordGT40.

The rest are fugly

[Black Panther]

Call me weird but I don't like sports cars lol.
My first preference goes to luxury VIP-type cars... (with the exception of pope-mobiles ;))
Second preference to bulky 4x4's... :D
I'll be posting more pictures later....

http://img.techpowerup.org/091221/jaguar_s_type-_4.2_se.jpg

http://img.techpowerup.org/091221/atlanta-limousine-service-1.jpg

Inside a limousine.... :D
http://img.techpowerup.org/091221/Limousine_Service_-_Las_Vegas.jpg


http://img.techpowerup.org/091221/cadi_esca.jpg

[T3hPwn3r3r]

http://www.toyota-supra.info/albums/fatf/1995_toyota_supra_fatf_12.jpg

Toyota? In a sexy car thread?

...wha wha whaaaat?

[Black Panther]

Toyota? In a sexy car thread?

...wha wha whaaaat?

It's modded sexy. That's why. ;)

[FordGT90Concept]

out of all them:

The fordGT40.

The rest are fugly
I have to agree. The GT40 has a nice ass. :D

[erocker]

not sure if this goes here or in the pic thread

http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/56/l_ba15b0228465409d9651aa08f2d1f550.jpg
http://c3.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/37/l_37ab9c94f1884f2eb7ca2f69a7587392.jpg
http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/59/l_25082657f93b4b4f96c2d483089d50fc.jpg
http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/53/l_941dfbefb4534511bbe5c2fc1da708f0.jpg

These would all be my choices! (toast)

[momentomoir]

These would all be my choices! (toast)

lol i went to a car show and i was omg so many sexy cars under one roof must take pics of all i left with 250 pics

[Triprift]

Toyota? In a sexy car thread?

...wha wha whaaaat?

Yeah a Supra wich puts yanks cars to shame same with Nissan GTR Subaru WRX Honda NSX and the Mclaren F1 is sex personified.

[FordGT90Concept]

Supra is only noteworthy if $100,000+ was pumped into it aftermarket (and it is still ugly on the outside). All other cars in this thread are natural (factory sexy). You know, no face lifts, boob jobs, and other plastic surgeries that turn sexy into fugly. ;)

If I wanted something like a Supra that is naturally sexy (in a rip your head off kind of way), I'd get this:

Dodge Viper:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/15/Draginline_waiting.jpg

[erocker]

http://i403.photobucket.com/albums/pp112/erocker414/Nissan_GT-R-5.jpg
http://i403.photobucket.com/albums/pp112/erocker414/130_0904_01_z1985_toyota_celica_sup.jpg
http://i403.photobucket.com/albums/pp112/erocker414/44913d1247355619-2010-ford-gt-500-s.jpg
http://i403.photobucket.com/albums/pp112/erocker414/audi-r8.jpg
http://i403.photobucket.com/albums/pp112/erocker414/mercedes-mclaren-slr-stirling-moss-.jpg

[T3hPwn3r3r]

It's modded sexy. That's why. ;)
It's rice.

[T3hPwn3r3r]

Yeah a Supra wich puts yanks cars to shame same with Nissan GTR Subaru WRX Honda NSX and the Mclaren F1 is sex personified.

lol

http://www.seriouswheels.com/pics-jkl/Jaguar-XJS-British-Racing-Green.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/47/JagXJS.jpg

http://www.whidbeycruzers.com/gm/S2010032_0032.JPG

http://coffeesautomotivecenter.com/cars/1974_Corvette_Conv_Dark_Red_diagtopdn.jpg

http://www.porschepedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/2008-porsche-911-gt2.jpg

Now for the best family car ever built:
http://i43.tinypic.com/2zj9bp5.jpg

Also, GTR has no manual transmission and only wins from a dead stop against the Corvette.
Subaru WRX is nothing special, for the same price you can buy a Camaro and not look like a boy racer. The Honda NSX?

It's a Honda, 'nuff said.

[1Kurgan1]

http://www.digitalcorvettes.com/corvette-photos/data/508/1969-corvette-4.jpg
http://www.yearone.com/yodnn/Portals/1/Images/ban3ut2_535.jpg


Yeah a Supra wich puts yanks cars to shame same with Nissan GTR Subaru WRX Honda NSX and the Mclaren F1 is sex personified.

Too bad you posted the most riced out Supra ever, just with triple black and call it a day, they are good looking cars, but not when they are taken from F&F and I still compare the LS series with the 2JZ anyday of the week.

[SK-1]

458 Italia
http://img.techpowerup.org/091222/Capture068.jpg
http://img.techpowerup.org/091222/Capture069.jpg
http://img.techpowerup.org/091222/Capture070.jpg

[Triprift]

In the end it goes down to opinion the cars i posted the supra and the mclaren f1 are both worthy cars and deserve to be just as much as hotted up yank brute cars.

[erocker]

I posted a Supra

http://i403.photobucket.com/albums/pp112/erocker414/130_0904_01_z1985_toyota_celica_sup.jpg

I drove an '85 for a couple years. It was a damn good car.

[SK-1]

In the end it goes down to opinion the cars i posted the supra and the mclaren f1 are both worthy cars and deserve to be just as much as hotted up yank brute cars.

mmmmmm Supraaaaa....
http://img.techpowerup.org/091223/Capture071.jpg
http://img.techpowerup.org/091223/Capture073.jpg

[FordGT90Concept]

RICE! *grabs a pitch fork*

[PP Mguire]

67 Shelby GT500 Super Snake
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/pp_mguire/Cars%20and%20PCs/richards1967fordmustangqx5.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/pp_mguire/Cars%20and%20PCs/shelby_super_snake.jpg

Shelby Aero
http://burnyourfuel.com/My_Files/Shelby-Supercar/SSC-Ultimate-Aero-01.jpg

Lamborghini Diablo Roadster
http://www.qv500.com/Lamborghini%20Diablo%20P11%203.jpg

Porsche 911 GT2
http://www.seriouswheels.com/pics-2008/r-z-0-9/2008-TechArt-GTstreet-RS-based-on-Porsche-911-GT2-Black-Side-Angle-Speed-1280x960.jpg

BMW M3 e36
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/pp_mguire/Cars%20and%20PCs/E36-AvusBlue.jpg

69 Camaro
http://www.noneckschevelle.com/images/carpics/Travis69%20camaro%20ss.jpg

Aston Martin DBR9
http://www.seriouswheels.com/pics-2005/2005-Aston-Martin-DBR9-SA-1280x960.jpg


And my personal favorite

Mach 1
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/pp_mguire/Cars%20and%20PCs/Picture052.jpg

[momentomoir]

67 Shelby GT500 Super Snake
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/pp_mguire/Cars%20and%20PCs/richards1967fordmustangqx5.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/pp_mguire/Cars%20and%20PCs/shelby_super_snake.jpg

Shelby Aero
http://burnyourfuel.com/My_Files/Shelby-Supercar/SSC-Ultimate-Aero-01.jpg

Lamborghini Diablo Roadster
http://www.qv500.com/Lamborghini%20Diablo%20P11%203.jpg

Porsche 911 GT2
http://www.seriouswheels.com/pics-2008/r-z-0-9/2008-TechArt-GTstreet-RS-based-on-Porsche-911-GT2-Black-Side-Angle-Speed-1280x960.jpg

BMW M3 e36
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/pp_mguire/Cars%20and%20PCs/E36-AvusBlue.jpg

69 Camaro
http://www.noneckschevelle.com/images/carpics/Travis69%20camaro%20ss.jpg

Aston Martin DBR9
http://www.seriouswheels.com/pics-2005/2005-Aston-Martin-DBR9-SA-1280x960.jpg


And my personal favorite

Mach 1
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/pp_mguire/Cars%20and%20PCs/Picture052.jpg

mmmm sexy

[1Kurgan1]

I'm not a big Mustang fan myself, the Elanor clones look nice, but every single person on earth wants one or wants to copy one, just over done. If I was going to buy a Mustang it would be a 69 or a 70, preferably a Boss, and if it wasn't I would have to clone it I think, they just look so sexy.

http://www.investmentmotorcars.net/inventory/list_thumbnails/boss5.jpg

[Wile E]

Yeah a Supra wich puts yanks cars to shame same with Nissan GTR Subaru WRX Honda NSX and the Mclaren F1 is sex personified.

It's the Supra from the first Fast and Furious movie. That automatically makes it a total fail.

Saw a Shelby in the OP, I was always partial to the '65 GT350R, personally.

http://img.techpowerup.org/091223/65_Shelby_GT350R_FstBck_DV-06-ARM_03.jpg

[PP Mguire]

I'm not a big Mustang fan myself, the Elanor clones look nice, but every single person on earth wants one or wants to copy one, just over done. If I was going to buy a Mustang it would be a 69 or a 70, preferably a Boss, and if it wasn't I would have to clone it I think, they just look so sexy.

http://www.investmentmotorcars.net/inventory/list_thumbnails/boss5.jpg

Oh you mean the same car which was my personal favorite?

[1Kurgan1]

Oh you mean the same car which was my personal favorite?

Was? The boss's are where it's at, every other Mustang just seems to lack something, I'm much more into Vettes, but I would definitely own a Boss if I had the chance.

[PP Mguire]

You can get any Mustang and put a Boss 302 in it. The only thing that makes it Boss is the Boss branded engine.

[1Kurgan1]

You can get any Mustang and put a Boss 302 in it. The only thing that makes it Boss is the Boss branded engine.

Correct, I like how the Boss's are styled. If I had a Mustang it would most likely demolish what a stock Boss could do anyways, I'm not much for keeping anything stock, to modify a Boss would be a tragedy. But it's not really a Boss branded engine, the 302 came in other Mustangs, and the 429 Cobra Jet did too.

[Triprift]

http://img.techpowerup.org/091224/Image001 (2).jpg

[PP Mguire]

Correct, I like how the Boss's are styled. If I had a Mustang it would most likely demolish what a stock Boss could do anyways, I'm not much for keeping anything stock, to modify a Boss would be a tragedy. But it's not really a Boss branded engine, the 302 came in other Mustangs, and the 429 Cobra Jet did too.The Mach1 in my pic and the Mach1 in your pic the only real difference (besides year) is mine has a 351C and yours has a Boss 302. The one in my pic has some different kits but thats aftermarket that the guy put on.

And yes, there is a Boss 302, and standard 302. The Boss 302 had different heads than the standard 302 as well as the CJ/Boss (nascar) 429 and Ford 429. The real performance monster was the Shelby 427 though.

[1Kurgan1]

The Mach1 in my pic and the Mach1 in your pic the only real difference (besides year) is mine has a 351C and yours has a Boss 302. The one in my pic has some different kits but thats aftermarket that the guy put on.

And yes, there is a Boss 302, and standard 302. The Boss 302 had different heads than the standard 302 as well as the CJ/Boss (nascar) 429 and Ford 429. The real performance monster was the Shelby 427 though.

Yeah Ford has many special models for the Mustangs back then, minor differences, but it's the color/stripe combos that are crazy on the Boss's, like baby blue or orange, that the other ones don't have that I like.

Either way, to buy a real Boss and swap out factory parts would be a shame. Mach's are much more common, but a base Stang would be the way I would go. The with probably orange and the boss striping.

[PP Mguire]

Machs are less common than base stangs actually and are actually a completely different car. I prefer them because of this. Its not everyday you drive down the road and see one in nice condition whereas i see alot of nice resto 67s and 68s like my parents.

Btw, the Boss 302 was brought back for the newer Mustangs. I just dont think they call them "Boss" anymore.

But yea your right. THe Boss cars usually had more exotic color schemes but that might have been trying to copy Euro cars of the day. Not sure.

[Wile E]

You can get any Mustang and put a Boss 302 in it. The only thing that makes it Boss is the Boss branded engine.

A 69 Boss doesn't have the "vents" in the rear quarter. There were subtle differences aside from the engine.

As far as the boss engine, not only were the heads, cam and intake different, but they also had an entirely different block. Boss 302 blocks are 4 bolt mains, regular 302's are only 2 bolt.

And if a I had a real Boss, I would modify the shit out of it. I don't care about collectability, I care how a car drives and performs.

[FordGT90Concept]

This thread is incomplete without the infamous DeLorean DMC-12:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d8/Delorean_dmc12_front.jpg/800px-Delorean_dmc12_front.jpg

Love or hate it, it's an icon of the 1980s.


I was going to post a pic of the 1993 Boss Mustang 10.0L but good pictures of it are hard to come by. :(

[1Kurgan1]

Machs are less common than base stangs actually and are actually a completely different car. I prefer them because of this. Its not everyday you drive down the road and see one in nice condition whereas i see alot of nice resto 67s and 68s like my parents.

Btw, the Boss 302 was brought back for the newer Mustangs. I just dont think they call them "Boss" anymore.

But yea your right. THe Boss cars usually had more exotic color schemes but that might have been trying to copy Euro cars of the day. Not sure.

Oh yeah for sure Mach's or any other special model are more rare than standard stangs. I haven't seen the new Boss, but I hear the 5.0 is back for 2010, so it would be a pretty cool package to put out there.

And if a I had a real Boss, I would modify the shit out of it. I don't care about collectability, I care how a car drives and performs.

I agree with having a car that performs, but the reason I say I wouldn't have a Boss, is because, why go out and waste that much money on a Boss, then tear it apart. You could pick up a base Stang toss in pretty much anything and be faster for 1/10th the cost, and even have it look just like a Boss.

[PP Mguire]

A 69 Boss doesn't have the "vents" in the rear quarter. There were subtle differences aside from the engine.

As far as the boss engine, not only were the heads, cam and intake different, but they also had an entirely different block. Boss 302 blocks are 4 bolt mains, regular 302's are only 2 bolt.

And if a I had a real Boss, I would modify the shit out of it. I don't care about collectability, I care how a car drives and performs.

If i wanted to name all the differences i would. And there are also differences in years between the 2 cars besides being a Boss and Mach1. I was just saying they are pretty much the same car.

[Wile E]

Oh yeah for sure Mach's or any other special model are more rare than standard stangs. I haven't seen the new Boss, but I hear the 5.0 is back for 2010, so it would be a pretty cool package to put out there.



I agree with having a car that performs, but the reason I say I wouldn't have a Boss, is because, why go out and waste that much money on a Boss, then tear it apart. You could pick up a base Stang toss in pretty much anything and be faster for 1/10th the cost, and even have it look just like a Boss.

Wasn't denying that, just saying that if I did happen to have a Boss, I would still modify it without remorse.

[1Kurgan1]

If I had one, I would probably do the same, just would hold on to all stock parts. But I just would never invest the money to get one, when faster can be made for cheaper and look the same, just like a ZL-1 Vette or Camaro (god I wonder what those cost).